BILLERICAY ACTION GROUP
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Current Situation
  • Planning Application Help
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Current Situation
  • Planning Application Help

Double blow for Green Belt - but glimmer of hope

13/10/2017

3 Comments

 
​First, the Objectively Assessed Housing Need (OAN) has gone up from 15k to 20k, double what local people require.
Secondly the Council is developing a “SW Billericay High Level Development Framework” with very large areas of further land (shaded in grey in the image) being considered to meet this new larger number.
We’re not saying that all of this land will be built on if we meet OAN, but around 1000 homes were planned there when the Council sought to build 15,000 so if they decide to meet the new OAN, we can expect the majority to go.
We believe that the Framework will look at how a large number of homes would fund the ‘Relief Road’ – a project which we fear will actually worsen traffic while diverting developer contributions away from socially useful alternatives such as Affordable Housing. The Framework may also consider school provision, such as the expansion of Buttsbury School, which has been suggested.
 ​
Won’t this mean they need to consult again?
Basildon Council consider that they’ve consulted on all these either during either the 2016 Draft Local Plan consultation or the ‘New and Alternative Sites’ consultation later in the year. This is unreasonable as many sites, for instance the golf course, were only mentioned as rejected alternatives in the earlier consultation and so attracted very little attention.
Picture
The sites under consideration for the Development Framework – all centred on the deeply flawed ‘Relief Road’ (Calling it that doesn’t make it so) – are as follows:
  • H20 - Tye Common Road: Area large enough for 360 homes (the rejected alternative number of homes in the 2016 Local Plan) is under consideration, larger than the 160 in the Draft Local Plan. The site could easily accommodate 750, so the 360 figure above is not the maximum that could be built on the site.
  • H21 - Football Club area: Area large enough for 360 homes (the rejected alternative number of homes in the 2016 Local Plan) is under consideration, larger than the 185 in the Draft Local Plan.
This includes ‘New Site 5’ which was included in the second of last year’s consultations.
  • H22 - Mountnessing Road Site (Redrow Homes): An area enough for 400 homes (the rejected option in 2016 Local Plan) is under consideration, larger than the 280 in the Draft Local Plan.
  • H23- Frithwood Lane area (Marden Homes): This area, currently a ‘Green Wedge’, is large enough for around 900 homes (the rejected option in the 2016 Local Plan) larger than the 330 preferred in the Draft Local Plan. The larger rejected area was also consulted on as Alternative Site 9 in the second consultation.
  • Salmon’s and Richdan Farm – enough land for around 900 houses. A rejected alternative to H20 in the 2016 Draft Plan.
  • Burstead Golf Course – enough land for around 1400 houses. A rejected alternative to H23 in the 2016 Draft Plan.
The map also shows neighbouring land at Windmill Heights which could see around 170 houses built.
All sites which were once alternative are potentially now ‘as well as’.
 
Glimmer of hope
Councils can produce a Plan with a Housing Target lower than their OAN, for instance if they’re lucky enough to have Green Belt and wish to preserve it. The regulations are clear, but theory and practice are somewhat different and it probably wouldn’t be plain sailing.
The cross-party Committee which has been overseeing the development of the Local Plan for the past few months has been seriously considering a lower than OAN Housing Target for the Plan, while Castle Point, Rochford, Southend and others are taking a similar approach. Such a move could see many of these sites saved, and the arguably counter-productive ‘Relief Road’ dropped.
We do think Councillors are serious, but we’re not sure how determined they are. We fear, perhaps unreasonably, that they’ll be easily discouraged and revert to meeting OAN while claiming that they tried their best.
The consequences of that for Billericay and the Borough would be extremely severe. ​
3 Comments
Mark
13/10/2017 10:03:36

We need to start demonstrating at the councils offices that we do not want to change our beautiful town and subsequently our beautiful surrounding countryside.

After all this is why many of us chose to live at Billericay in the first place.

How can these Councillors change and affect so many lives,bet they don't even live in Billericay!

Reply
Mrs lebeau
13/10/2017 14:23:00

Neither the council or the building companies cannot be trusted. What happened to the lake in the park that was going to be replaced.
The number of houses keeps going up and billericay is only a small town not meant to have such a large population.

Reply
Graham P Moat
16/10/2017 16:41:46

It would seem that this posting was made after my last comment was submitted so please ignore this. However the posting does not make it at all clear to me as to what is now potentially likely to be included in the Councils Final plan. Who is now stating the revised number of homes on these sites? i.e. For Site H23 Frithwood Lane, which comprises of 2 fields partly bordering the ancient and protected Frith Woods. Who is actually stating that this site could provide for 900 homes when the number that appeared in the previous published plan was only 330? Rumour has it that the Tennis Club has already been sold off so with that known then there is a problem certainty that the surrounding areas i.e. the Football and Cricket Grounds and adjoining areas will also be incorporated. Also the Borough Diary published a short article stating that the Local Development Scheme update will be discussed at a Full Council meeting that was to be held on 12 October. So does this herein stated proposal perchance emanate from the outcome of that meeting? And as for the so termed Relief Road there is a published report from Essex Highways in 2012 that stated in their opinion that this would not relieve present congestion much more than the far cheaper option of making Laindon Road 2 ways and putting a filter road on the Sun Corner roundabout. But as this would encroach on Common land the Filter Lane option may have been discounted. The Councils approach seems chaotic and the above post does not make the situation clearer.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Aims of BAG

    To protect the Green Belt around Billericay and elsewhere in Basildon Borough from loss through excessive and unjustified development.

    To prevent the character of our historic towns from being changed forever.

    To ensure that any development that does take place is sustainable, with adequate infrastructure and prioritises local needs.

    We support the need for a new Basildon Local Plan and the need for more housing. But it must be of the right number, the right type and in the right places to best help local people obtain a home of their own.
    Picture

    Join our Facebook Group

    Our most up to date activity can be found on our closed Facebook Group - Save Billericay From Housing Developments. Ask to join here;
    www.facebook.com/groups/BillericayActionGroup/

    Information on the Local Plan

    The latest summary position on the long history of the Basildon Local Plan can be found here;
    Current Situation

    Historical items from the withdrawn Local Plan can be found here;
    2014 to 2034 Withdrawn Plan Archive

    The Four Firsts Charter

    This will be updated for the 2023 to 2043 version of the Local Plan but the Four Firsts will remain a core set of principles.
    the_four_firsts_charter.pdf
    File Size: 424 kb
    File Type: pdf
    Download File


All information on this site should be accurate. If you believe something to be incorrect please email us via the Contact page and we will endeavor to correct it as quickly as possible.
Picture
Picture
Picture
Copyright 2024
Billericay Action Group